Flat / Inverted chastity cage
/https://preview3d-images.cults3d.emulatorsite.com/kkw2zmdsbujjd06g730alpyfvvvu)
/https://preview3d-images.cults3d.emulatorsite.com/p5r88bdclol86oanh3ta91byk6mk)
/https://preview3d-images.cults3d.emulatorsite.com/d0wvg0896464kgnvaebdvsxkxe1t)
/https://preview3d-images.cults3d.emulatorsite.com/aqd579w77wvpcyloygxatghiakfe)
/https://preview3d-images.cults3d.emulatorsite.com/kg604m69pnke8ixixyzu2ydrsz56)
/https://preview3d-images.cults3d.emulatorsite.com/zridwk3ymba5bhoqswmxxtelnqet)
/https://preview3d-images.cults3d.emulatorsite.com/pbmm1r1x9xed1cxiarn2up02euun)
/https://preview3d-images.cults3d.emulatorsite.com/0x4hjkwpd0ymo8lb4ii9stwlz893)
/https://preview3d-images.cults3d.emulatorsite.com/zui1t3476zfm5rruy0whg9231wuy)
- 6.5k views
- 56 likes
- 116 s
- 0 collections
- 1 comment
- 0 makes
| License | |
|---|---|
| Usages | |
| 3D design format |
9 files (STL) Close
|
| Publication date | 2025-03-16 at 15:38 |
| Design number | 2827689 |
Would you like to Cults?
You like Cults and you want to help us continue the adventure independently? Please note that we are a small team of 4 people, therefore it is very simple to us to maintain the activity and create future developments. Here are 3 solutions accessible to all:
- ADVERTISING: Disable your ad blocker.
- DONATE: Make a donation via Ko-Fi ๐.
- WORD OF MOUTH: Invite your friends to come, discover the platform and the magnificent 3D files shared by the community!
Sharing and ing on Cults3D guarantees that designs remain in makers community hands! And not in the hands of the 3D printing or software giants who own the competing platforms and exploit the designs for their own commercial interests.
Cults3D is an independent, self-financed site that is not able to any investor or brand. Almost all of the siteโs revenues are paid back to the platformโs makers. The content published on the site serves only the interests of its authors and not those of 3D printer brands who also wish to control the 3D modeling market.
ellagjameson
ellagjameson
I like this design a lot! I printed out every file in ABS, sanded, and dipped in acetone to solidify and smooth them.
I like the style of the inverter, it's very comfortable and ergonomic. Well, as comfortable as an inverted cage can be.
There are some issues, though.
First, I would love to see a variety of flat cages with different openings. A slit for easier urination, and possibly some aesthetic designs like a vagina.
Second, the rings need to be curved more to fit the body. As it is, the balls get pulled out too far, and it is distinctly less comfortable in those areas than, for example, the EasyCB v5.
Third, I don't like the locking pin design. It is difficult to fit most small padlocks into it because it is so long. I have been using a keyring as it is the most comfortable, but of course, I would prefer to use a proper lock. Frankly for this type of cage I would prefer one of those integrated tube locks, or a similar pin that goes though and allows the lock to be placed off to the side. Often, you can design a locking mechanism that s either an internal lock OR the side-lock pin interchangeably, I would like to see that design.
Also, the locking pin is a bit too long. It's fine for your 3D printed padlock, but for most other locks it allows the cage to slide away from the ring and can cause pinching. I made some length modifications in Blender for my prints.
Fourth, it would be nice to have a few normal (non-inverted and not flat) cages that are compatible with the base rings. Of course that's a bit outside of the title, but it would be nice to have a couple "nub" sizes to allow for longer-term wear, as the flat/inverted ones are only really good for short periods.
Finally, I wish there were holes for shoelaces or harness straps, as the inverted cages are much more comfortable when held against the body by something in addition to the balls.
It turns out the side posts that were initially intended for also served as makeshift loops. I used some shoelace to make a sort of belt, and the device became much more comfortable to wear, and did it's job better. Additionally, to compensate for the uncurved ring pulling the balls up more with the strap, I am using tight underwear to sort of tuck them back. With those 2 workarounds, the device is actually surprisingly comfortable. As in, I might be able to be 12 hours or more in it comfortable.
Hey, thanks for that thorough !
As you just said, I added loops to one of my other design but they were a bit fragile and also it made the cage more bulky so I thought that you could fit a harness somewhere on the ring so I ditched them but I'll see what I can do on the next designs/updates.
I take notes of everything regarding the locking system, it could definitely be improved.
Finally, concerning the aesthetic, I use solidworks so sculpting isnt my forte lol, also the face to print has to be somewhat flat but I'll see what I can do to add a nub cage to that design.
Anyway, I'll either update that model or make a complete new design, idk yet, thanks again!
That makes sense, and I have a bit more that you might appreciate then. First, the lace holes can be integrated in a way that allows them to be discreet enough to be ignorable but still a lace. This one has this style on the top, I feel like if you added 1 extra going through the center bottom of the ring (to run the center of the lace through) it would be perfect. The other nice thing about these style of holes is they tend to be virtually unbreakable, as they use the layer adhesion angle and the material of the ring itself for added strength.
In of the connecting system, I am a HUGE fan of the "EasyCB V5" style of slide lock, it requires no additional side s, no center pin, and it can be designed to lock with either bolts like the EasyCB or a proper tube lock like some of these Chinese estim cages do. It's the same shape for the mechanical mounting, the only difference is if the cage has a divot there to a tube lock or if it has holes for nuts/bolts. I kinda prefer the ease of the EasyCB but also the security of a real lock at times, so honestly I would prefer to have both options, but if you had to pick one to design for, I would say go for the integrated tube lock. That system can also use a pin instead of the tube, and the padlock is put off to the side.
As for making a more ergonomic shape for the ring, there are 2 main options in Solidworks. You could make a 3d curve and then sweep a profile along it, or you could define the outer edges and use the surfacing tools in SW to build the geometry a single face and curve at a time. I would personally choose the sweep method as it seems easier and more controllable, I'm pretty sure that's how the EasyCB v5 got its curves. Only a small (but well-adhering) area of the EasyCB touches the build plate, and you must use s to allow the ergonomic shape to print correctly. I prefer this, as it is still very easy to manufacture and gives a far more comfortable shape.
If I were you, I'd probably make a V2 of this design and put it up for sale. Hope this is valuable!
Oh, one other small thing!!! Last night I had a very odd failure of the smallest (least restrictive) inverted cage. Basically it still allowed enough room for me to get erect enough to push my gland through the cage! It took some lube, patience, and calming breaths to squeeze it back out, the head was beginning to turn blue a bit. This is not an issue with the deeper inverted rings, I suspect because there isn't as much force pushing straight out. I think making the thinnest point of the cages even smaller would prevent people with smaller like me from having a potential hospital visit.